...They also had a journal of events that lined up with the happenings at camp. The handwriting—the one I found familiar from some of the earlier notes—also matched some of the earlier notes. The idiotic ones.
[ hangman and the chart ]
So Aquarius was one set of handwriting, even if they lied when I asked them. Given that, personality-wise, I expect that Aquila or Lepus is the other. Though due to something Vulpecula said, it seems more likely to be Aquila.
[ he listens thoughtfully, but then shakes his head with a sigh. ]
Being vague helps no one at this point. If you cannot speak of it, you may tell me so outright and I will take no offense, but I cannot compare my experiences to yours without some details.
In matters relating to the details of the staff, caution appears to be heavily emphasized. As such, only suggestions and theories may be posited in the place of certainties.
But I believe others will attempt to communicate similarly, so let us try to listen well even outside of these circles.
[jiji's fine speaking in riddles and roundabouts but that's just how he talks. someone save our straightforward people.]
I was discussing with someone about what people may have found in staff rooms, and while I was given no details, it was said in such a way that there were... extra items the staff might have, as if to help them to play their role as staff.
Added, in a way, was the sense I had from what they weren't trying to say.
[ she tilts her head but pats his arm, now that she has a better guess of who aquarius may be based on what was said. ]
It won't hurt to think it over again. There's nothing to say whose theory is correct at the moment, especially since so many are trying not to say things in certainty out of caution.
I think we need to pay more attention to what we know about them, and then compare that to what these notes we are finding say.
I can't really say anything more concrete than that, since I am still trying to figure out my thoughts about it. [ HE WASN'T EXPECTING TO HAVE TO TRY TO ARTICULARE WORDS ]But I do think that Aquarius' answer does imply they were simply agreeing to whatever was said to them.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
That journal is almost certainly Aquarius.
no subject
Sounds like Aquarius, all right...
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
...They also had a journal of events that lined up with the happenings at camp. The handwriting—the one I found familiar from some of the earlier notes—also matched some of the earlier notes. The idiotic ones.
[ hangman and the chart ]
So Aquarius was one set of handwriting, even if they lied when I asked them. Given that, personality-wise, I expect that Aquila or Lepus is the other. Though due to something Vulpecula said, it seems more likely to be Aquila.
no subject
... I just think there is more to this than it appears on the surface.
no subject
no subject
[ hmm. ]
Did everything in the room seem like it made sense with one another?
no subject
Otherwise, it made some sense to me. What did you observe?
no subject
Familiarity - but not without some oddity. And it is that oddity that disrupts understanding.
no subject
Being vague helps no one at this point. If you cannot speak of it, you may tell me so outright and I will take no offense, but I cannot compare my experiences to yours without some details.
no subject
It is as you say.
In matters relating to the details of the staff, caution appears to be heavily emphasized. As such, only suggestions and theories may be posited in the place of certainties.
But I believe others will attempt to communicate similarly, so let us try to listen well even outside of these circles.
[jiji's fine speaking in riddles and roundabouts but that's just how he talks. someone save our straightforward people.]
no subject
Added, in a way, was the sense I had from what they weren't trying to say.
no subject
[ he says, clearly wishing for death ]
Sylvain and I can review to think of whether such things were there.
no subject
It won't hurt to think it over again. There's nothing to say whose theory is correct at the moment, especially since so many are trying not to say things in certainty out of caution.
[ so it's just circling around people's circles
hoping you're reading the right circles ]
no subject
I can't really say anything more concrete than that, since I am still trying to figure out my thoughts about it. [ HE WASN'T EXPECTING TO HAVE TO TRY TO ARTICULARE WORDS ]But I do think that Aquarius' answer does imply they were simply agreeing to whatever was said to them.
no subject
I agree that Aquarius would do so. Though... what we are to make of the content of these letters is a bit beyond me at the moment.
no subject